\u201cHow would our experience of reality be different if
existence were commonly imagined to be a collective affair?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Reading about Karen Barad, her influence in multispecies thinking in the issue of Antennae Magazine on Multispecies Intra-actions<\/a>...<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2014 the interview with Kirksey\u2014 Pindell's writing on Beuys and Decomposition (de-composing, compost, breakdown seems like an interesting counterpoint to what we think of as \u201cproduction\u201d and there\u2019s more and more \u201cwork\u201d in that category in the human world: handling returns, doing repair work, recycling and handling waste) <\/p>\n\n\n\n Kirksey interview: Pindell essay: My questions: <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n","type":"rich"}
- poaching from ethology, a field conventionally understood as \u201cthe study of animal behavior in a natural environment.\u201d
- queering science, the performative turn. possibly some clues on how to write this Multispecies Union<\/em> manifesto
- why the term nonhuman<\/em> emphasizes the binary too much; more-than-human world<\/em> also.
Multispecies world(ing<\/em>) does better.
-
Links:
Feral Atlas<\/a>
Gleaning Stories, Gleaning Change<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Considerations and etymology of aesthetics (misunderstood as beauty and used as a tool of power), with regards to decay, compost.
Kant - \"German \u00c4sthetik in the sense of a \u201cscience dealing with the principles of perception by the senses,\u201d returning to the roots and rhizomes of the word\"<\/em> and \"The original meanings of the word aesthetic are
relational, communicative, performative; to return to them is to queer several hundred years of capitalist commodification of the aesthetic experience. Aesthetic, as a verb and as a noun, parallels Barad\u2019s definition of Agency: a relational enactment rather than a quality that one passively has or observes.\"<\/em>
\"If we accept Barad's thesis that phenomena\u00a0(including ourselves) are performatively created in the world's
ongoing reconfiguration of itself, then it follows that our\u00a0experience of those phenomena (including ourselves) are also dynamically intra-active experiences.[x] Aesthetics are\u00a0intra-actively performative communications, a dynamic\u00a0dialogue of perceptions and responses.<\/em>\"
Beuys' Bog Action<\/em>
Bernie Krause's biophilic listening, Pauline Olivieros' deep listening<\/em>
Derrida: \"The question of the said animal in its entirety\u00a0comes down to knowing not whether the animal speaks but whether one can know what 'respond' means. And how to\u00a0distinguish a response from a reaction.\"
Paul Stamets on mycelial communication
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- What is poachable<\/em> here?
- Need research on the aesthetics of work, labor, production and what could be transposed or expanded to encompass a multispecies world
- Ideas about listening sessions, regenerative practices, a systems approach to worlding
- Research into accumulation, regeneration-- how to generate a multispecies list of demands?
- to shed the yoke of capitalism, and restore our vitality
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n